The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > and most times, those have to be merged into the source tree due to > extensive changes anyway ... maybe we should just get rid of the use of > pgindent altogether? I think pgindent is a good thing; the style of different parts of the code would vary too much without it. I'm only unhappy about the risk issues of running it at this late stage of the release cycle. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian