> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these > > indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job > > of obfuscating the code changes. > > I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an > incremental basis, but only once per release cycle. That at least > lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle. What about having it happen on every CVS commit? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] pgindent run? Bruce Momjian