Gregory Stark wrote: > I understand the thinking but I disagree that "various optimizations speeding > up merge sort, reducing contention at transaction start and end, ..." is > entirely content-free. I agree that nobody is really going to be specifically > saying "gee, i wish we could use postgres but merge-join is just too slow". > However as a user I find it helpful to get a kind of overview of the kinds of > invisible changes there were so I can get a feel for the magnitude of the > improvements between versions.
Agreed. You will have to convince Tom because it was mostly such items from him in previous release that he asked to be removed. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
