-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:26:11 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tom and you disagreed. I understand the reasoning and I don't > > actually disagree with the thought process but I think the thought > > process is flawed. I do not believe people only look at the release > > notes for "wow cool". I believe they look at them to see who > > deserves kudos in this release. > > OK, that was clear to me. You are saying based on the criteria we > have used in the past our system of feedback works (good), but the > criteria used isn't 100% agreed. > > My point is that it isn't that I am too subjective and closed to > feedback on adding/removing items, but rather the policy used isn't > open for feedback; but it really is. Should we open discussion of > changing the policy? > That sounds reasonable. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHXb93ATb/zqfZUUQRAvdXAJkBuL3h1ZRA3j40JBJ9V1pWglF1uACdFBYr e+234rZRsjT+2AqFoyoQ2Nc= =33Td -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq