On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:59:50 -0400 Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you posted it last month then it was too late for the commit-fest > that started on March 1, IIRC, so the fact that you didn't get > feedback is hardly surprising - a commit-fest is like a > mini-feature-freeze. O.k. then what happens at that point? It wasn't in the queue for May (I had to add it) > > As for the rest, we are still feeling our way a bit, as should have > been apparent from the list emails, so formal documentation is > probably premature. I assumed the docs would be subject to change but "something" that gives one off and not often patch submitters a clue is probably useful. It also allows us to actually discuss a pattern of behavior we are starting versus bouncing through 50 threads trying to figure out what's next. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
