Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >>>>> If you posted it last month then it was too late for the > >>>>> commit-fest that started on March 1, IIRC, so the fact that you > >>>>> didn't get feedback is hardly surprising - a commit-fest is like a > >>>>> mini-feature-freeze. > >>>>> > >>>> O.k. then what happens at that point? It wasn't in the queue for > >>>> May (I had to add it) > >>>> > >>> I review it and apply or reply to the author. The wiki had started > >>> being updated after your submission so this is a transitionary phase. > >>> > >> Wait... apply where? The wiki? or to the tree? > >> > > > > Apply to CVS. > > > > > > Bruce, I know you don't mean this, but it reads like you are undertaking > to review and apply all patches.
Didn't you read "review it and apply or reply to the author". > BTW, I don't see why the wiki can't pick up patches that were submitted > before it started. True. Frankly, I am getting pretty tired of people complaining about what I am doing. Perhaps I should just stop and let everyone else deal with things. I have lots of things I would rather be doing. This is one of the reasons I didn't want to add wiki maintenance to my already full workload. Instead I am having to field complaints. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
