-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > This is one of the reasons I didn't want to add wiki maintenance to my > > > already full workload. Instead I am having to field complaints. > > > > I didn't mean to complain about anything. Personally, I'm in favor of > > reducing your workload. > > OK. FYI, what would be really nice would be for someone to review and > apply the patch or give the author feedback so we could avoid adding it > to the wiki at all.
Bruce, Yes, that would be nice! But not likely in practice, unless your patch happens to immediately catch the interest of a suitably qualified person with commit privileges. However, I don't know of any way the maintenance of the wiki is an addition to your workload. I feel that the onus of adding the patch to the wiki should be on the submitter, and we've already had some success getting submitters to add their own patches. And Alvaro has already offered to pick up the slack in cases where the submitter fails to add their patch to the queue. Every patch that somebody else adds to the wiki is another patch you don't have to add to your queue, so how can this be anything but a plus for you? Cheers, BJ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iD8DBQFIBlfb5YBsbHkuyV0RAs6tAKDNR3CbqFC4YwROaoiwNMXSWKXWTgCbBaz1 pO90zcotv+/UMJrotfDTg/M= =IY5R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers