On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > and I'm beginning to think that we need to invoke that provision. > Particularly with regard to hot standby, which by any sane reading was > not close to being committable on 1 November (a fortiori from the fact > that it's *still* not committable despite large amounts of later work).
maybe what we need is to put a policy for large patches... something like: if you submit a large patch that introduce fairly complex new features very late in the release cycle (maybe at the last commit fest or previous to that one) then there are no promises about committers to review them... maybe that will enforce authors to send patches more often and more early... and of course, the rest of us that make some kind of review (call it: testing or code review) should start making those reviews on large patches (just like someone suggests) -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
