On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 17:47:52 Dave Page wrote: >> The primary case that I'm objecting to is HS which you've >> been saying will take 10 - 12 months to complete having by your own >> admission not looked at the code or followed the discussion >> particularly closely. > > Is there another committer or expert with a different ETA estimate? >
Heikki, who has been in-depth reviewing the patch for some time, quoted a figure of 2 weeks for the known issues. AFAIK, he has not revised that estimate since. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
