On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:17 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 22:56 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > > >>> Since it's going to take us two weeks to clean up the other loose ends > >>> anyway, there's no harm in letting Simon and Heikki try to complete the > >>> patch by then. But I'll happily lay a side bet with you about what the > >>> situation will be two weeks from now. > >> I think Tom wins this bet, since it's now been four weeks. In fact, > >> he was being optimistic: the loose ends aren't cleaned up either > >> (based on a review of the wiki, we're about half way there: six > >> patches have been committed in the intervening time and seven remain > >> in the queue). > > > > I agree. It is time to move on. > > Huh? What features are you saying about to be moved on? > Is it the updatable-view feature? or rest of all pending ones?
Tom originally stated (as I recall, no flames please) that we would wait for 2 weeks for the hot standby stuff. It has now been four. That is what I and I believe Robert Haas are talking about. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Thanks, -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
