Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:17 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: >> Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 22:56 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >>> >>>>> Since it's going to take us two weeks to clean up the other loose ends >>>>> anyway, there's no harm in letting Simon and Heikki try to complete the >>>>> patch by then. But I'll happily lay a side bet with you about what the >>>>> situation will be two weeks from now. >>>> I think Tom wins this bet, since it's now been four weeks. In fact, >>>> he was being optimistic: the loose ends aren't cleaned up either >>>> (based on a review of the wiki, we're about half way there: six >>>> patches have been committed in the intervening time and seven remain >>>> in the queue). >>> I agree. It is time to move on. >> Huh? What features are you saying about to be moved on? >> Is it the updatable-view feature? or rest of all pending ones? > > Tom originally stated (as I recall, no flames please) that we would wait > for 2 weeks for the hot standby stuff. It has now been four. That is > what I and I believe Robert Haas are talking about.
Thanks, it helps me clear. P.S, I would like folks not to forget SE-PostgreSQL. -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
