Dave Page wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: > >> In this case, createdb - however, this particular case is of very > >> minor impact to us. My gripe is more on the general issue of being > >> potentially forced to add support for a new version and beta test > >> tools in the same timeframe that PostgreSQL has for beta. > > > > I hear you, but really the only way we could promise that would be to > > have a period before beta of nothing happening in the core project while > > tools authors do their thing. ?That doesn't seem productive. ?We're > > trying to get some parallelism here, not serialize all the development > > and testing. > > Agreed - I certainly don't want to see things stand still. I just > chatted with Bruce, and we discussed the idea of prioritising patches > with API changes in the last commitfest to try to make things as > painless as possible. I suggest we discuss this in Ottawa, when we > review the whole commitfest idea.
Good. Also, as I said before, I think having the open items list on a wiki is the best interface we are going to get; I can't possibily keep such a list current myself. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
