Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Tom,
> It fits into 80 columns if you don't have any functions with 11
> parameters. ;-)
Well, yeah, but in typical cases I think it fits. A look at the current
regression database shows all but 6 of 117 functions fitting. With
another ten characters eaten by a new column, a lot more of them would
wrap.
> Actually, I'm thinking the new column ought to be called "type".
Yes, that's what I had in mind too.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
