On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 03:12:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > > Tom, It fits into 80 columns if you don't have any functions with > > 11 parameters. ;-) > > Well, yeah, but in typical cases I think it fits. A look at the > current regression database shows all but 6 of 117 functions > fitting. With another ten characters eaten by a new column, a lot > more of them would wrap. > > > Actually, I'm thinking the new column ought to be called "type". > > Yes, that's what I had in mind too.
Excellent idea. I just plain don't believe that there's anything process-critical and automated that depends on \da, although we could have it rewritten as an alias for convenience. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
