On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:35:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> writes: > > It occurs to me that we ought to allow for a possibility that a > > function can be more than one special case. For example, sum() is > > both an aggregate and a windowing function, while rank() is only a > > windowing function. > > If it makes the display even one character wider, -1 from me. > That's a purely hypothetical problem for the classification > we're discussing. (No, I don't feel a need for \df to remind > me every time that aggregates can also be window functions.)
OK :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
