* Dimitri Fontaine (dfonta...@hi-media.com) wrote: > A better way to solve this is to have the database post_search_path (or > call it search_path_suffix) contain the extensions schemas. Now the > roles are set up without search_path_suffix, and it's easy to add an > extension living in its own schema. (we'll have to choose whether > defining a role specific search_path_suffix overrides the database > specific one, too). > > Having all extensions live in pg_extension schema also solves the > problem in a much easier way, except for people who care about not > messing it all within a single schema (fourre-tout is the french for a > place where you put anything and everything).
I certainly agree with this approach, naming aside (I'd probably rather
have 'system_search_path' that's added on as a suffix, or something
similar).
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
