Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com> writes:
> Le 29 mai 09 à 16:11, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
>> I think almost all these difficulties could be overcome if we had
>> some sort of aliasing support, so that arbitrary objects in schema a
>> could be aliased in schema b. If that were in place, best practice
>> would undoubtedly be for each module to install in its own schema,
>> and for the DBA to alias what is appropriate to their usage scenario.
> This coupled with Peter's idea of nested namespace seems a killer
> feature for me.
What it sounds like to me is an amazingly complicated gadget with
absolutely no precedent of successful use anywhere. We'll spend a year
fooling with the details of this and be no closer to actually solving
the problem at hand, namely getting a simple workable extension
packaging facility.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
