On 5/28/09 12:36 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
That really seems exactly to be what we're proposing with pre_ and post_ search_path components: don't change current meaning of search_path, just give DBAs better ways to manage it. And now that you're leaning towards a search_path suffix, don't you want a prefix too?
Yeah, I thought about a prefix, but I couldn't come up with a way it would be useful, and I could come up with a lot of scenarios where it would be a big foot-gun.
-- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. www.pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
