On May 28, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
"we all agree that a specific pg_extension schema is a good idea,
as
soon as user is free not to use it at extension install time".
I don't think we all agree on that at all. ;-)
Ooops, my mistake, as few people where taking that as implicit and
as a
reasoning basepoint in their mails, I assumed we were past the
question
already. Sorry to see that's too quick a conclusion... and thanks for
pointing out the absence of consensus!
I somehow missed Andrew's mail, but I agree that we don't all agree on
that point. I'm fine with having a standard schema for extensions,
just as long as I can tell the installer to actually install it in a
different schema if I want/need to do so.
Best,
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
