Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > There has been discussion about how to be more hard-nosed about > rejecting patches. I think it has to start with us being more > hard-nosed about giving patches feedback --- the very idea we had to > create commit-fests reflects that we historically have not done an > organized job of processing patches.
> If we review patches as soon as they appear, and give rapid feedback, we > can easily reject patches that take more than a few days for the patch > author to resolve, and there would be little slippage; the same goes > for dealing with known bugs. I know it can be done, but I don't promise > it would be pleasant. In other words, you propose dropping the idea of commitfests, and expecting committers to spend *all* their time reviewing? Tain't happening. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers