Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > >>> If we review patches as soon as they appear, and give rapid feedback, we > >>> can easily reject patches that take more than a few days for the patch > >>> author to resolve, and there would be little slippage; the same goes > >>> for dealing with known bugs. I know it can be done, but I don't promise > >>> it would be pleasant. > >> > >> In other words, you propose dropping the idea of commitfests, and > >> expecting committers to spend *all* their time reviewing? Tain't > >> happening. > > > "I don't promise it would be pleasant." > > I'm not sure which part of "no" you didn't understand, but this > committer is not buying into that proposal.
Again, I am pointing out it could be done, but it would be unpleasant, as you mentioned. We can't move make progress unless we understand the underlying causes of our delays. I am not suggesting we adopt it for reasons you mentioned. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
