Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > There has been discussion about how to be more hard-nosed about > > rejecting patches. I think it has to start with us being more > > hard-nosed about giving patches feedback --- the very idea we had to > > create commit-fests reflects that we historically have not done an > > organized job of processing patches. > > > If we review patches as soon as they appear, and give rapid feedback, we > > can easily reject patches that take more than a few days for the patch > > author to resolve, and there would be little slippage; the same goes > > for dealing with known bugs. I know it can be done, but I don't promise > > it would be pleasant. > > In other words, you propose dropping the idea of commitfests, and > expecting committers to spend *all* their time reviewing? Tain't > happening.
"I don't promise it would be pleasant." -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
