Robert Haas wrote: > > If we review patches as soon as they appear, and give rapid feedback, we > > can easily reject patches that take more than a few days for the patch > > author to resolve, and there would be little slippage; ?the same goes > > for dealing with known bugs. ?I know it can be done, but I don't promise > > it would be pleasant. > > Also agreed. It's never pleasant to have a patch rejected/postponed, > but it's tolerable if you've gotten some feedback and understand the > reasons why. Of course there is no guarantee that you will agree with > those reasons, but that's life. Some day you may be the committer and > have your turn to irritate patch submitters. :-)
Our only limitation is our own sense that we have been fair to patch authors, i.e. there is no external restriction on how we handle things. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
