On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> It's been a couple of weeks now, and I've had a number of reports both >> on-list, on-blog and in private, from people using this. I have not >> yet had a single report of a problem caused by this patch (not >> counting the case where there was a version mismatch - can't fault the >> patch for that). > >> Given that, I say we apply this for 8.3 and 8.4 now. Comments? > > 8.2 as well, no?
8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
