On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >>> It's been a couple of weeks now, and I've had a number of reports both >>> on-list, on-blog and in private, from people using this. I have not >>> yet had a single report of a problem caused by this patch (not >>> counting the case where there was a version mismatch - can't fault the >>> patch for that). >> >>> Given that, I say we apply this for 8.3 and 8.4 now. Comments? >> >> 8.2 as well, no? > > 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv > shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I > haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a > separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first.
Has anyone reported the problem on 8.2? -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
