On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:58, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> 8.2 as well, no? > >> 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv >> shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I >> haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a >> separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first. > > If it's at all hard to do, I could see deprecating 8.2 for Windows > instead.
I haven't looked at how much work it would be at all yet. So let's do that before we decide to deprecate anything. As mentioned downthread, 8.2 is a very widespread release, and we really want to avoid deprecating it. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
