On tor, 2009-12-31 at 11:12 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > David E. Wheeler wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2009, at 1:04 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > >> I think the primary use will be to load a JSON value into Perl or Python > >> and process it there. So a json type that doesn't have any interesting > >> operators doesn't sound useless to me. The features I would like to get > >> out of it are input validation and encoding handling and smooth > >> integration with said languages. > >> > > > > What about access to various parts of a JSON data structure? Or is that > > just asking for too much trouble up-front?
> IMNSHO it's essential. I think Peter's approach of ignoring this > requirement is extremely shortsighted. Whose requirement is it? I'm not ignoring it, but so far no one has actually said that it is a requirement and why. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
