Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > We could if we could all stop long enough to address them. ?I think > > there is the feeling that a great idea will pop up eventually, and only > > when we are looking at beta do we realize we are out of time, and the > > hard, sometime distasteful/ugly, decisions have to be made. > > I think there's definitely some truth to that. It's basically a > project management issue: how do we make sure that decisions get made > on a way forward in a timely fashion? Of course, you already know my > opinion: the first thing we need is a good list of what the issues > are. :-) > > >> > What amazes me is how many people who closely follow our development are > >> > mystified by what we do during that pre-beta period. > >> > >> Hey, I'm still mystified. ?Maybe you and Tom could do twice-a-week > >> status updates on what you're working on and anything you could use > >> help with, or something. > > > > Yea, that would probably help. ?I know I am not very transparent in this > > area. > > Just my opinion: I think it would be awesome.
I tried publishing my email box but it we heavily criticized. The problem is that the status of the items is very fluid and I don't have much time to update status because I am usually spending time trying to close them. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
