On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:52 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine > <dfonta...@hi-media.com> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I agree. My main concern in terms of dealing with these outstanding > >> is that it will distract us, particularly Tom, from stabilizing the > >> tree, especially HS, VF, and SR. If the tree were in a releasable > >> state today I wouldn't be worrying about it. > > > > You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta > > instead. > > I think I was pretty clear about what I was proposing in the message > with which I started this thread - bump some or all the big, > outstanding patches to leave more time for stabilizing the tree. > > Almost everyone said "no". That's the community's decision and I > accept it, but IMHO it's a tacit decision to slip the release.
Agreed. (although I think we should bump the big outstanding patches) Joshua D. Drake > > ...Robert > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
