Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: > >> I agree. ?My main concern in terms of dealing with these outstanding > >> is that it will distract us, particularly Tom, from stabilizing the > >> tree, especially HS, VF, and SR. ?If the tree were in a releasable > >> state today I wouldn't be worrying about it. > > > > You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta > > instead. > > I think I was pretty clear about what I was proposing in the message > with which I started this thread - bump some or all the big, > outstanding patches to leave more time for stabilizing the tree. > > Almost everyone said "no". That's the community's decision and I > accept it, but IMHO it's a tacit decision to slip the release.
Agreed that "it's a tacit decision to slip the release". If HS and SR had been tested and stable in October we might have had a chance for June, but at this point it seems very unlikely. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
