Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dfonta...@hi-media.com> wrote:
>> You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta
>> instead.
> I think I was pretty clear about what I was proposing in the message
> with which I started this thread - bump some or all the big,
> outstanding patches to leave more time for stabilizing the tree.
> Almost everyone said "no". That's the community's decision and I
> accept it, but IMHO it's a tacit decision to slip the release.
I don't think that was the conclusion. What I thought we were saying
was that we didn't want to bounce those patches in advance of any CF
review at all. But IMO we should put the larger patches on a very short
leash: if they don't appear pretty clean and trouble-free, they should
get postponed. We need to minimize the time spent on new patches, but
we don't have to drive it to zero.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
