On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:08 PM, David E. Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com> wrote:
..... > > Because it's an aggregate that cocatenates values. It's not an aggregate > that lists things. I also like concat_agg better than string_agg because > it's not limited to acting on strings. > ..... Given that it potentially produces a delimited list, not a straight conacatenation (and that list is unacceptable since it would be descriptive as a noun but not as a verb) would implode_agg not be the most descriptive name? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
