On tis, 2010-01-26 at 03:08 -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jan 25, 2010, at 23:14, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > why is concat_agg better than listagg ? > > Because it's an aggregate that cocatenates values. It's not an > aggregate that lists things. I also like concat_agg better than > string_agg because it's not limited to acting on strings.
What else can it act on? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
