On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > But what it *produces* is a string. For comparison, the > SQL-standard-specified array_agg produces arrays, but what it > acts on isn't an array.
Meh. This is all just bike-shedding. I'm fine with string_agg(), though in truth none of the names has really been great. The inclusion of "agg" in the name is unfortunate. I'll have a look at Pavel's new patch now. David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers