On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> But what it *produces* is a string.  For comparison, the
> SQL-standard-specified array_agg produces arrays, but what it
> acts on isn't an array.

Meh. This is all just bike-shedding. I'm fine with string_agg(), though in 
truth none of the names has really been great. The inclusion of "agg" in the 
name is unfortunate.

I'll have a look at Pavel's new patch now.

David


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to