"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes:
> Meh. This is all just bike-shedding. I'm fine with string_agg(), though in
> truth none of the names has really been great. The inclusion of "agg" in the
> name is unfortunate.
Yeah, I wouldn't be for it either if it weren't for the precedent of
array_agg. I was quite surprised that the SQL committee chose that
name, because they've avoided using the term "aggregate function" at
all, but there it is ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
