2010/1/28 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Takahiro Itagaki > <itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> * Do we need better names for string_agg1_transfn and string_agg2_transfn? >> They are almost "internal names", but we could have more >> like string_agg_with_sep_transfn. > > Surely the names of the transition and final functions should match > the name of the aggregate. But if there's a proposal on the table to > call this string_app_with_sep() instead of just string_agg(), +1 from > me.
no, >>>string_app_with_sep<<< is too long for common using. Pavel > > ...Robert > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
