Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Hmm, AFAICS the problem with controldata is that it uses postgres_fe.h
> instead of postgres.h. It's a bit of a stretch to use the latter, but
> maybe that's a better solution? After all, it *is* poking into the
> backend internals.
I seem to recall that Solaris had problems with that due to dtrace
support or something? However, we are doing it in pg_resetxlog,
so I suppose it's ok for pg_controldata as well.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
