Tom Lane escribió: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Hmm, AFAICS the problem with controldata is that it uses postgres_fe.h > > instead of postgres.h. It's a bit of a stretch to use the latter, but > > maybe that's a better solution? After all, it *is* poking into the > > backend internals. > > I seem to recall that Solaris had problems with that due to dtrace > support or something?
Hmm, I wonder if you're referring to the fact that Zdenek wanted to restructure the headers for something? I don't know if this was because of compiler issues or the binary migration tool he was working on. > However, we are doing it in pg_resetxlog, so I suppose it's ok for > pg_controldata as well. I hadn't noticed that, but yes. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
