Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Should we allow -1 to mean "keep all segments"?
> Umm, you can't keep all segments around forever, can you? Surely you > have to recycle them sooner or later or you will run out of disk space. You couldn't use that as a permanent setting, but it can make sense as a transient setting, rather than having to guess how much WAL you'll need to keep while setting up a new standby. > In practice, you can just set wal_keep_segments to some ridiculously > high value to achieve the same result. True. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers