Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > Bruce Momjian escribió: >> Which is where my 'wal_keep_segments = -1' idea came from.
> Are you suggesting that -1 should mean "keep all segments that fit on > disk, but if creating a new segment fails with ENOSPC, recycle the > oldest one"? No, keep means keep. Even if there were some arguable use for "keep if you can", a scheme like that would render the machine unusable --- everything else on the same filesystem would be falling over. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers