>> > > I think we should fix it now. Quick thought: maybe we could use FOR instead > of AS: select myfunc(7 for a, 6 for b); IIRC the standard's mechanism for > this is 'paramname => value', but I think that has problems because of our > possibly use of => as an operator - otherwise that would be by far the best > way to go. >
What is advice of "FOR" instead "AS"? it is exactly same. Regards Pavel > cheers > > andrew > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
