Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=281
> +1 for applying something along these lines, but we'll also need to > update walreceiver to actually use one or more of these new > parameters. Right, but the libpq-level support has to come first. > On a quick read, I think I see a problem with this: if a parameter is > specified with a non-zero value and there is no OS support available > for that parameter, it's an error. Presumably, for our purposes here, > we'd prefer to simply ignore any parameters for which OS support is > not available. Given the nature of these parameters, one might argue > that's a more useful behavior in general. > Also, what about Windows? Well, of course that patch hasn't been reviewed yet ... but shouldn't we just be copying the existing server-side behavior, as to both points? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers