On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 11:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > > Florian Pflug wrote: > >> Yeah, I agree. Just enabling keepalive should suffice for 9.0. > > > +1, with configurable timeout; > > Right, of course. That's already in the pending patch isn't it?
Can someone tell me what we are going to do about firewalls that impose their own rules outside of the control of the DBA? I know that keepalive *should* work, however I also know that regardless of keepalive I often have to restart sessions etc. There are environments that are outside the control of the user. Perhaps this has already been solved and I don't know about it. Does the master<->slave relationship have a built in ping mechanism that is outside of the TCP protocol? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
