On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Right, of course. That's already in the pending patch isn't it? > >> Is this sarcasm, or is there a pending patch I'm not aware of? > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=281
+1 for applying something along these lines, but we'll also need to update walreceiver to actually use one or more of these new parameters. On a quick read, I think I see a problem with this: if a parameter is specified with a non-zero value and there is no OS support available for that parameter, it's an error. Presumably, for our purposes here, we'd prefer to simply ignore any parameters for which OS support is not available. Given the nature of these parameters, one might argue that's a more useful behavior in general. Also, what about Windows? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
