Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I think this should be working now. I made this change to mk-snapshot,
>> and a similar one to mk-stable_snapshot. I have run the snapshot
>> generation for master, and the one for 8.4 should finish in a
>> minute or so. I have disabled the cronjobs until someone else has
>> verified the tarballs.
Do you still need someone to do that, and what do you want done exactly?
>> When I do, I'll also enable generation of snapshots of REL9_0_STABLE.
>> We currently do back to 8.2 - should we keep that, or drop 8.2?
> hmm I would say we should do all supported branches because those are
> the ones that people might be interested in when looking for a fix on a
> branch...
FWIW, I think back to 8.2 is sufficient. The branches earlier than that
are going to be unsupported in a matter of weeks anyway. And if no one
has complained about the lack of nightly tarballs for them to date,
it's unlikely that they'll start complaining now.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
