On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:28, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> >>> On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> >>>> Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they >>>> will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will >>>> export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We >>>> can obviously get that working for the HEAD branch (by just mapping it >>>> to a branch called pgsql), but I don't know how doable that is for >>>> backbranches. >>> >>> We need to have a fix for this before we can do any more backbranch >>> releases. >> >> Fix for what, exactly? (assuming that people update their bf animals of >> course) > > how exactly should people fix their BF members - is there any howto or such > on how to deal with the new git2cvs gateway?
Andrew has posted info on how to convert them to git, I believe. I don't think there are any for the git2cvs gateway, since it's not up yet. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers