Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 12:22 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Mind you, I think bf members will need tweaking anyway, since they
will assume the old style cvs layout. AFAICT, git-cvsserver will
export each branch as a module, rather than one module as pgsql. We
can obviously get that working for the HEAD branch (by just mapping it
to a branch called pgsql), but I don't know how doable that is for
backbranches.

We need to have a fix for this before we can do any more backbranch
releases.

yeah having to touch ever BF member despite the fact that we have a git->cvs gateway seems heavily annoying and not really expected. However if this must be done oen should send a proper headsup and howto to the buildfarm member list (people need to add the 9.0 branch as well so we better tell them this now instead of having to do work twice).



Stefan

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to