On sön, 2010-12-26 at 12:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > We did clean up C++ keyword uses in the header files in 9.0, but your > report shows it's already gotten broken again. I'm disinclined to fix > it unless someone steps up to create an automated test that will get > run reasonably often. We had that discussion when the patch to rename > keyword-named fields was proposed, and nothing got done, and the > current state of affairs is the entirely predictable result.
src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck What's missing is to automate this, but it's unclear in what context, and perhaps also to what extend this should be a hard requirement. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
