On 27 December 2010 19:17, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > [ shrug... ] If it's not a keyword according to popularly available > tools, then I really have zero interest in worrying about it. This > is an exercise in making the headers useful in practice, not in academic > standards conformance.
It isn't academic and I'm not just being pedantic, because the standard introduces many new, useful features. A lot of popular C++ libraries optionally use C++0x through the use of conditional compilation. For example, my distro's libstdc++ standard library (which is mostly header-based due to the fact that it is mostly comprised of templates and inline functions) has many #ifdefs, so that things like move constructors (a big performance win for standard library containers) are available. It just seems prudent to assume that if any of these pg headers are being included in C++ TUs, they might well be using C++0x. -- Regards, Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
