Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghega...@gmail.com> writes: > I hope that we don't make the mistake of not checking for collisions > with C++0x keywords, for which GCC 4.3+ has partial support. The new > standard is almost complete, so it will probably become a lot more > relevant soon. There are quite a few new keywords in C++0x, including:
[ shrug... ] If it's not a keyword according to popularly available tools, then I really have zero interest in worrying about it. This is an exercise in making the headers useful in practice, not in academic standards conformance. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers